Let me just say up front: I think it's a bad thing to murder children. I want to make that as clear as I can possibly make it. I'm worried that later you'll think "Hmm, I think I see the point he's trying to make, but I can't be sure unless I can cobble together a better picture of his position on child murder," so I'm saving us all some time. Don't wonder. In my book, it's definitely something to avoid. Even if you're pretty sure you can get away with it.
I put that last caveat in not because I have any concrete plans or by way of legally-actionable, court-admissable confession. It's just that I've spent some time in Social Awkwardness Jail over the last couple of weeks because I don't have an opinion about this Caylee Anthony thing.
The conversations all start the same, with the tsk and the head-shake and the "Can you believe...?" For the record, no, I can almost never believe. Especially if we're only work acquaintances. Whatever you say that follows, no, in fact, I can hardly believe that such a thing could have occurred in any universe. If I nod long enough and say something like "Man, isn't that just the way?" I can get back to my desk way faster than I would were I to engage in even the slightest hint of critical pushback or even minimal engagement.
Usually it's something blandly tolerable like ...the outcome of a sporting event of some note. Or ...the extremity and/or notable inoffensiveness of the current weather conditions. Those are safe because then people are really only just looking for a walk-by affirmation anyway. I'm happy to distribute those when I can. They cost me nothing. Well, apart from time. And it's not much time. Yes, it's irretrievable in the zero-sum, linear progression of finite existence, nudging me one step closer to inevitable death trapped in a meaningless bubble of irrelevancy and discomfort beyond my control. But I'll feel less awkward next time I see you in the corridor than I would had I blindly brushed past you as I so desperately wanted to, so, you know... fair trade.
But when people have been watching "the news," with all the implied pre-digested outrage, and are trolling for a position for something as heinous as child murder, well, you have to put in a little bit more effort. Even if--and this is important--even if you know nothing about the merits of the case.
Have I watched a minute of the trial coverage? I have not. In fact, I have made a concerted and increasingly strenuous effort to avoid it completely. It stalked me through most of the news outlets and basic cable channels I'm known to casually peruse, so there was no small amount of tacking and plotting going on to avoid the shoals of Child Murder Television. I'm an American in 2011. There's a lot of competition these days for my depression attention. I really don't feel a strong desire to go seeking out new sources of despair.
The obligation remains, however. I feel like there is room to make a sophisticated point: this woman was accused of horribly murdering (I'm rethinking the adjective already... is there a non-horrible option?) her defenseless child. There is a trial. The outcome is acquittal. Can I believe it? Turns out I can. Especially when I know nothing of the circumstances. Was it a clean acquittal? Don't know. Prosecutorial incompetence? Purely circumstantial evidence? Jury tampering? Insanity? Demonic possession? Self-defense? Absolutely no idea. There are a thousand ways a person might not be convicted of something, up to and including non-guilt. It seems reasonable. But if I get "Can you believe..." and don't come back with the head-shake and the tsk, I get the very strong impression that I'm somehow perceived as being pro-child murder.
This is where I refer you very quickly back to the beginning of this piece. I will restate: Fully, 100% anti-child-murder, I am. AND STILL I have no opinion about the outcome of this case. It is possible both things are simultaneously true.
And before you get started, don't bother: I already know what it says about me that I didn't put the flag out on the 4th of July, too. See, I'm more than used to having my actions imply sentiment. You won't get a long treatise out of me about that, though. I'm pretty comfortable being a presumed terror-loving communist. Child murder though, that's where I have to draw the line.
Thursday, July 7, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
my mom was obsessed - addicted, really - to Child Murder Television. I happened to be visiting for the closing arguments and verdict, and could NOT avoid the coverage. Which was hideous and offensive to anyone who has spent any time at all contemplating the american legal system.
I made the mistake of voicing my satisfaction with the outcome, because I kind of believe in more evidence than "look at this slutty bad mother!"
And I was subsequently accused of (and I quote) "crossing a Moral line."
because, you know, saying "I'm glad the American legal system worked here" is the same thing as saying "I think people should be allowed to murder children whenever they want!"
because commie pinko pacifist vegetarians like myself are strong advocates for child murder.
Humph. all this noise and hubbub and hyperbole about one sadly dead child, when hundreds, thousands, of kids around the world are dying of preventable disease, hunger, and American bombing errors.
GRRRRRR.
sorry about that. i have strong feelings, not so much about the Case, as about people caring so goddam much about the case.
I could never quite figure out why vegetarians are all pro-child murder. It seems like such a funny contradiction. Unless they also secretly eat children, haha. Um... haha?
Post a Comment