Back when I used to be a writer, I had this thing where I reviewed movies I'd never get to see, at least not in a timely fashion. Like everything else in those days, the bitterness of too much free time and not enough freedom was the driving motivating factor behind its creation. It's the same combination of factors that got me kicked out of my housewives' online reading club. Let's see how much Jane Austen you have to read before you start SWEARING IN ALL CAPS too. And if you're reading this, fuck you, Brenda. I still say the girls would have liked Palahniuk if you'd just let us give it a chance.
Now I have less free time than I did when I was staying home with the kids, but, ironically, I have all the freedom I want to see movies. It helps that the kids have gotten older now, so there's less worry about being the guy with the crying children in the movies. It almost never happens now. Almost. But look, the rules are R is Restricted wherein no one under 17 is allowed in without parent. With parent, it's every pre-teen for himself. Sometimes Daddy wants to see the one with exploding heads and plot-unnecessary boobies. So yes, sometimes there is crying. But it's manageable. They're all past what the Catholic church calls the "age of reason." For the church I think it's mostly a legal out for implied consent. For me, it means I can convince them to cry at a more reasonable volume if I threaten to take away their Nintendo DS.
The daddy-time outings are rare. I may now have the time to whip out the suffocated, insufferable, douchebag of a cinephile long dormant in me, but I'm stuck for the most part seeing things that a 12-year-old boy might want to see. Or does want to see. I know this because he asks me directly. Or when the commercial comes on, he says something compelling like "Whaaaaaaaa, awwwweessoooomme!" in the way only California public schools can teach one to articulate.
So hooray, more movies! And boo, Green Lantern and Transformers: Dark of the Moon. Yes, I know there was a gap where I wasn't able to get out as much, but at my age, there's no excuse for not expecting big stupid loud action movies to be some combination of loud, stupid and big. So that's not really the complaint. Although, that said, I should be allowed to complain about another fucking Transformers movie. Not just a fighting robots movie, but a Michael Bay fighting robots movie. Not really a haven for nuance, unless by "nuance" you mean a new invented single-word meaning describing the ability to ascertain the pubic-hair configuration of a woman via the tightness of the dress she's wearing. Which I now do. Most nuanced film ever.
Green Lantern had kind of the same problem except all the tight and/or missing clothing happened to Ryan Reynolds. He basically spent the entire film in a green onesie. I spent most of the film, as you can imagine, thinking "dang, this film could use a lot more nuance."
That said, I was still a little ashamed of my erection.
The moral of this and probably all other stories ever is be careful what you wish for. As I noted above, my oldest is 12. And all the movies he wants to see are PG-13. Which means, as a parent, this means not only do I have to sit through shitty movies and pretend they're not shitty afterward while the kids talk about how awesome they are (don't worry, I puncture their self-esteem by "accidentally" referring to them by girls' names), but quite often I will have to sit through these films twice, once solo as a pre-screening, then with the boys.
Rarely does a pre-screen lead to an overrule. With the last Harry Potter movie, it just meant I knew when to tell the scaredy-cat ones to cover their eyes, but we still went. The only one I rejected on their behalf was X-Men: First Class. The part where the Nazis murder someone's mother and then later when a guy dies by having a coin very slowly and lovingly passed through his skull were enough to exercise my executive veto.
You'll be happy to know I don't have to see all of them twice. Transformers, I mean, fuck, come on. First of all, Mr. Bay lacks the narrative or constructive skill to manufacture a scene of any psychological impact, frightening or otherwise. Plus, I fucking wish a movie like that would give the kids nightmares. Then maybe I can dare to hope they'd at least pause before considering seeing the next abomination of CGI battle porn.
Thursday, June 30, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
those Movies You Won't Get To See reviews were pretty good, as I recall.
I'm impressed that you pre-screen. That's some serious dedication (dadication?).
The best scathing movie review I have ever read is about the new Transformers. It's really pretty great (the review, I mean, not the movie). Sometimes, it's nice to see, in print, someone pointing out the hideous bullshit of terrible movies.
http://filmfreakcentral.net/screenreviews/transformers3.htm
Wow, you pre-screen? My dedication to honoring the rating system is based on how much I want to see it. If I don't want to, sorry, PG is too adult for you. Pirates of the Carribean PG-13? No problem, just hide your eyes when it looks like something nightmare-inducing may come up.
Of course, I was way more concerned about the rating system before I had my first. Then, my stay-at-home hubby insisted on watching Austin Powers with the young one in the room. Sure, she was only 3 months old, but, still, you know?..... Thing is, when he would inadvertently get in the way of the television when it was on, she'd scream. Unobstructed vision - dream child.
Needless to say, I quickly converted. But, I no longer allow her to watch those movies, now that she is "past the age of consent", as you and the Pope say.
I think I see a new opportunity for movie reviews for you. "Movies I Intend to Damage My Children With" with, instead of a hot babysitter/Andrew Shue scale, something like a Josef Mengele (for The Human Centepede type movies)/Barney (for seven aching hours of Care Bears)scale.
KnK: We need the official reviews pointing out shit because you can't rely on regular people. The conventional wisdom on this particular skidmark is generally favorable. Why? Because, as I sort of alluded to, it's not the indefensible pile of shit the last one was. This now qualifies as a point of critical reference. And based on that, it will make a billion dollars. Well, that and Chicago gets more or less pulverized. Nobody really likes Chicago.
Kay-Z: The Austin Powers movies are ones I remember enjoying when they came out but am now sort of embarrassed that I did. Seems unfair and I'm almost certain it's more a reaction to the people doing awful Austin Powers impressions than the films themselves, but what's fair really? The good news for your kid is that she can grow up being pre-embarrassed by them. That's good parenting in my book.
Post a Comment